Home | Resources | Services | Hosting | Publications | Collaboration | Joining CERL | About CERL |

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
membership:access_for_cluster_libraries [2014/09/02 17:03] – [Access for Cluster libraries] hartmembership:access_for_cluster_libraries [2014/09/02 17:23] – [Decision to approve] hart
Line 32: Line 32:
 Nevertheless, any of these elements may be taken into account. In addition it is possible to draw up a profile of a cluster group:  Nevertheless, any of these elements may be taken into account. In addition it is possible to draw up a profile of a cluster group: 
  
-  * The libraries will operate under the aegis of one Full member.+  * The libraries will operate under the aegis of one Single member.
   * They will have important collections and/or automated files in progress of significance for the HPB Database which in due course may benefit.   * They will have important collections and/or automated files in progress of significance for the HPB Database which in due course may benefit.
   * Since the Consortium’s aim is to make the database as comprehensive as possible, it hopes to include any files created in the cluster libraries.   * Since the Consortium’s aim is to make the database as comprehensive as possible, it hopes to include any files created in the cluster libraries.
   * They will have in common either a local or regional or national location, or specialist subject matter (e.g. medicine, architecture).   * They will have in common either a local or regional or national location, or specialist subject matter (e.g. medicine, architecture).
-  * The criterion 'small' is in many cases not appropriate. The notion may be useful that in spite of a distinct identity they operate within a larger library structure in which the Full member has a leading role. +  * The criterion 'small' is in many cases not appropriate. The notion may be useful that in spite of a distinct identity they operate within a larger library structure in which the Single member has a leading role. 
-  * It is not feasible to expect that they will be able to become a Full member, a Special member or a partner in a Group membership.+  * It is not feasible to expect that they will be able to become a Single member, a Special member or a partner in a Group membership.
  
 ===== Decision to approve ===== ===== Decision to approve =====
Line 43: Line 43:
 Since it is clearly not possible to formulate a set of absolute criteria, it follows that each proposal will have to be judged on its individual merits. Since it is clearly not possible to formulate a set of absolute criteria, it follows that each proposal will have to be judged on its individual merits.
  
-The CERL Board of Directors is the governing body in control of membership. The decision to accept a proposal made by a Full member will therefore be made at the discretion of the Board of Directors. A standard period is however agreed as the term after which the arrangement should be reviewed.+The CERL Board of Directors is the governing body in control of membership. The decision to accept a proposal made by a Single member will therefore be made at the discretion of the Board of Directors. A standard period is however agreed as the term after which the arrangement should be reviewed.
  
  
 membership/access_for_cluster_libraries.txt · Last modified: 2014/09/02 17:24 by hart

 

 

Recent changes RSS feed Valid XHTML 1.0 Driven by DokuWiki