Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revisionBoth sides next revision | |||
resources:cerl_thesaurus:editing:format:290 [2012/08/31 09:57] – external edit 127.0.0.1 | resources:cerl_thesaurus:editing:format:290 [2017/07/18 12:11] – jahnke | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ====== 290 Source referred to in a record ====== | + | ====== 290 Source referred to in a record |
- | \\ | ||
- | <block tableinvisible> | ||
- | | **Mandatory: | ||
- | | **Repeatable: | ||
- | | **Related fields:** |[[321|321]]| | ||
- | </ | ||
- | \\ | ||
- | |||
- | |||
==== Field Definition and Scope ==== | ==== Field Definition and Scope ==== | ||
Line 25: | Line 16: | ||
**Indicator 1:** undefined (blank) | **Indicator 1:** undefined (blank) | ||
- | **Indicator 2: Specifies the type of input:** | + | **Indicator 2:** undefined (blank) < |
* **0** Field has been input or corrected by cataloguer and cannot be overwritten in automated updating processes | * **0** Field has been input or corrected by cataloguer and cannot be overwritten in automated updating processes | ||
- | * **1** Field has been input by automated addition; review by cataloguer may be necessary | + | * **1** Field has been input by automated addition; review by cataloguer may be necessary |
=== Subfields === | === Subfields === | ||
- | ** $6 Source File Reference (O;NR) **\\ | + | <del>** $6 Source File Reference (O;NR) **\\ |
- | see the [[numerical subfields|description of numerical subfields]]. | + | see the [[numerical subfields|description of numerical subfields]].</ |
\\ | \\ | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
Line 44: | Line 35: | ||
==== Input Conventions ==== | ==== Input Conventions ==== | ||
- | There should be only one field 290 per original record repeating the subfield $a as often as necessary. | + | There should be only one field 290 per <del>original</ |
When a reference work is cited for a specific variant name it should be given in one of the 4XX fields in subfield $s. Sources specifically relating to the relationship of the given entity to another one should be given in the subfields $s of the 5XX fields accordingly. | When a reference work is cited for a specific variant name it should be given in one of the 4XX fields in subfield $s. Sources specifically relating to the relationship of the given entity to another one should be given in the subfields $s of the 5XX fields accordingly. | ||
When records from CERL members are used for the CT they may not have sources in separate fields (such as [[290|290]] and [[291|291]]). Examples for such a case are found in the ESTC records, where reference works and short titles of works, in which the name of a 2XX is occuring, are all filed in the same field. In this case the CT record will have all this information mapped to field [[290|290]]. | When records from CERL members are used for the CT they may not have sources in separate fields (such as [[290|290]] and [[291|291]]). Examples for such a case are found in the ESTC records, where reference works and short titles of works, in which the name of a 2XX is occuring, are all filed in the same field. In this case the CT record will have all this information mapped to field [[290|290]]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Repeated fields 290 will be merged into one during ingest. | ||
==== Mapping ==== | ==== Mapping ==== | ||
Line 57: | Line 50: | ||
- 290 # | - 290 # | ||
- 290 # | - 290 # | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Internal Representation ==== | ||
+ | <code javascript> | ||
+ | {" | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Change History ==== | ||
+ | * // | ||
+ | * // | ||
+ | * // | ||
resources/cerl_thesaurus/editing/format/290.txt · Last modified: 2020/01/23 08:14 by jahnke